Latest Cannabis News
309-306-1095 [email protected]

Florida Weed Laws

Do you need guidance?

Marijuana Laws in Florida Might Change

Florida weed laws may soon change to allow far more participants into the licensed cannabis business in the Sunshine State. 

A lawsuit is challenging the subtle differences between the Medical Marijuana Amendment passed by the citizens in 2016 and the Medical Marijuana Statute passed by the Florida legislature in 2017. 

Weed Laws in Florida Allow Medical Marijuana

Florida weed lawsFlorida has a robust medical marijuana program, but its laws have locked out many would-be entrepreneurs from joining the cannabis industry.

Patients can get their medicine, but small business has been locked out from a free market system.

Here is a list of qualifying conditions for Florida Medical Marijuana Patients: 

  • Cancer
  • Crohn’s Disease
  • Epilepsy
  • Glaucoma
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Other Debilitating Condition of Like, Kind, Or Class
  • Parkinson’s
  • PTSD
  • Anorexia
  • Anxiety
  • Arthritis
  • Back Pain
  • Cachexia
  • Diabetes
  • Hepatitis C
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Lyme Disease
  • Migraine
  • Muscle Spasms
  • Muscular Dystrophy
  • Other Conditions that result in traumatic stress
  • Severe & Chronic Pain
  • Severe Nausea
  • Sickle Cell Anemia
  • Spasticity

We discuss and detail the arguments that may help change the Florida weed laws when it comes to the medical marijuana laws in Florida.

Florigrown – Florida Vertical Integration Marijuana Law Challenged

Florigrown, a Tampa-based cannabis company, is seeking to obtain a medical-marijuana license to register as a Medical Marijuana Treatment Center (a “MMTC”). 

Florigrown is challenging the Legislature’s vertical integration law as unconstitutional because there are statutory provisions that conflict with the plain language of the Medical Marijuana Amendment (the “MMA”).  Florigrown argues the Florida legislature lacked the authority to create a competitive licensing structure, and/or require vertical integration of the cannabis licenses.

 

Florigrown, LLC v. DOH – case no. 2017-ca-002549

The lower courts ruled in favor of Florigrown and held the law unconstitutional. The state passed a constitutional amendment, the MMA, which the Florida Legislature codified under Section 381.986 of the Florida Statutes, entitled Medical use of marijuana. 

The legislature deviated from the MMA by requiring competitive licensing and by requiring vertical integration in order to become a MMTC.

The Florida Department of Health (the “FDOH”) is appealing to the Florida Supreme Court and asking it to reverse this ruling to continue the vertically integrated requirement that bars most new businesses from entering the Florida legal marijuana market.  MMTCs routinely cost tens of millions of dollars to open, if you can get a license for one. 

Florigrown, LLC v. DOH – Legal Brief

2019-1464_brief_136245_answer20brief2dmerits

 

What Florida’s Medical Marijuana Law Says about Vertical Integration

The medical marijuana policies and regulations set forth in the MMA are administered by the FDOH. The FDOH is the state official designated to enforce section 381.986, Florida Statute. 

In July 2017, section 381.986, Florida Statute, went into effect, which provides: 

A licensed medical marijuana treatment center shall cultivate, process, transport, and dispense marijuana for medical use. § 381.986(8)(e) Fla. Stat.

Therefore, the legislative MMTC defined under section 381.986 requires vertical integration – but we need to compare it to what the MMA that the Florida voters passed says about MMTCs.

What Florida’s Medical Marijuana Amendment Says about Horizontal Integration

In 2016, 71% of Florida voters approved the MMA to the Florida Constitution that allowed the legal use of medical marijuana by constitutional amendment. As a single issue amendment to the Florida Constitution, the MMA also defined MMTCs.

The MMA defines an MMTC as “an entity that acquires, cultivates, possess, processes . . . sells, distributes, dispenses, or administers marijuana products containing marijuana, related supplies, or educational materials.”

The MMA contrasts the Florida Medical Marijuana Statute because one is written in the disjunctive, the MMA, while the other is written in the conjunctive, the Florida medical marijuana statute.

Florigrown argues the MMA allows horizontal cannabis licenses. 

The people voted for “or” and not the “and” that the Florida Legislature codified under its vertically integrated medical marijuana law. 

Horizontal integration allows more entities to be  involved in the process of cultivating, producing, and dispensing medical marijuana by lowering the cost of entering the vertical market and by opening up the number of available license types as the MMA disjunctively provided.

The reviewing court weighed the language “and” in the Florida Statute, and the word “or” in the constitutional amendment in rendering its decision.  

The appellate court ruled that the 2017 medical marijuana law requires entities to “conform to a more restricted definition that is provided in the constitutional amendment,” which resulted in its unconstitutionality. 

RELATED POST: FLORIDA CANNABIS LAWYER

RELATED POST: FLORIDA MARIJUANA MARKET

Florigrown does not operate in a vertical integral system and argues that was the point of the MMA. 

Florida voters approved the constitutional amendment with the intent to add “horizontal licensing to their constitution in order to ensure the availability and safe use for medical marijuana.”

Florigrown has argued that the statute undercuts the constitutional amendment because Florida citizens approved the amendment with the intent to add horizontal licensing in the registering process.

Furthermore, the MMA spells out specific types of entities that could obtain separate licenses for different business functions such as growing, processing, and distributing the product.

Florigrown’s Second Constitutional Argument Against Competitive Licensing of Medical Marijuana Businesses

Additionally, the Florida medical marijuana statute establishes a competitive and restrictive licensing process which limits how many entities can register as a vertically integrated MMTC.

Florigrown has also argued that FDOH’s actions are unconstitutional because they granted special advantages, benefits, and privileges that apply only to certain entities.  

FDOH selectively chose and arbitrarily granted a limited number of MMTC licenses.  

FDOH then permitted these licensees to sell its highly desired license for more than 50 million dollars to other entities. 

FDOH allowed the sale of MMTC licenses even if the licensee never operated to produce any marijuana at all, or even serve one patient.

The FDOH is arguing that the constitutional amendment is silent on whether a MMTC needs to be horizontal or vertically integrated. 

It has stated that “nothing in the amendment alters the Legislature’s power to make policy decisions related to the regulatory oversight of medical marijuana in Florida.”

The State also argues that the “Legislature acted within the scope of policy discretion afforded it by the Florida constitution in setting requirements for licensure and initial market participation.” 

Florida claims that the 2017 law “ultimately establishes a comprehensive and unified statutory system for the statewide license and regulations of MMTCs.”

The Florida Constitution governs in this situation because it is the supreme law of land. 

FDOH’s actions were unconstitutional when it chose to abide by Florida statute, rather than the MMA. 

Does the Medical Marijuana Amendment or Medical Marijuana Statute Apply to MMTCs?

The MMA was enacted by the citizens of Florida, not the Legislature. The Florida Statute was enacted by the Legislature. 

The Florida Constitution states that a Legislature cannot enact laws inconsistent with a constitutional amendment.

A public policy argument can be made, but maybe not as persuasively as the textual argument regarding the and/or language Florigrown has raised. Vertical integration systems do not support fair market principles. 

Vertical integration systems prevent other potential market participants from competing in the cannabis industry. They also allow market participants to control the supply of medical marijuana if there are a low number of competitors. 

Because this system restricts competition, market participants can set a high price for medical marijuana preventing medical patients from purchasing medical marijuana at a reasonable price. 

Essentially, registered MMTCs in vertical integration systems have a monopoly on medical marijuana. 

And that is what has happened, only four companies (Trulieve, Surterra, Curaleaf, and Liberty Health) command over 81% of the market share for medical grade cannabis flower in Florida. 

In a horizontal integration system, smaller companies have the opportunity to be involved and compete in the medical marijuana industry. 

For example, a company may specialize in one aspect of the business which would result in a lower cost to enter the market, and perhaps higher quality due to specialization.

The Florida Supreme Court issued a request for a rare second day of oral arguments to exclusively cover the issue of the constitutionality of Florida’s vertical integration requirement for marijuana businesses on October 7, 2020. 

Tune into Cannabis Legalization News to stay up to date with this breaking story about Florida Medical Marijuana Laws – Subscribe Now.

Minnesota Cannabis Licenses

Minnesota Cannabis Licenses

On May 1st, the Health Finance and Policy Committee passed a bill to legalize marijuana by a vote of 11-8, raising the total number of committees that have advanced the proposal to 10. The bill would allow adults that are 21 years or older to purchase and possess up...

Thomas Howard

Thomas Howard

Cannabis Lawyer

Thomas Howard has been in business for years and can help yours navigate towards more profitable waters.

Thomas Howard was on the ball and got things done. Easy to work with, communicates very well, and I would recommend him anytime.
R. Martindale

Cannabis Industry Lawyer is a Stumari designed website for Tom Howard’s consulting business and law practice at the law firm the Collateral Base.
Minnesota Cannabis Licenses

Minnesota Cannabis Licenses

On May 1st, the Health Finance and Policy Committee passed a bill to legalize marijuana by a vote of 11-8, raising the total number of committees that have advanced the proposal to 10. The bill would allow adults that are 21 years or older to purchase and possess up...

Kentucky Ban of Delta-8 THC

Kentucky Ban of Delta-8 THC

Kentucky Delta-8 THC Hemp Ban Delta-8 THC is illegal according to Kentucky's interpretation of federal law - at least according to the general counsel of the Department of Agriculture - who really has no authority to make conclusions of federal law. Delta-8 THC has...


316 SW Washington Street, Suite 1A
Peoria, Illinois 61602

Phone: (309) 740-4033 || Email:  [email protected]


150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2400,
Chicago IL, 60606 USA

Phone: 312-741-1009 || Email:  [email protected]


316 SW Washington Street, Suite 1A
Peoria, Illinois 61602

Phone: (309) 740-4033 || Email:  [email protected]


150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2400,
Chicago IL, 60606 USA

Phone: 312-741-1009 || Email:  [email protected]

Cannabis Industry News

Cannabis Industry News

Subscribe and get the latest on the cannabis industry.  Includes exclusive content only shared with subscribers.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This